246 Carter responded to the Soviet intervention by withdrawing the salt II treaty from the Senate, imposing embargoes on grain and technology shipments to the ussr, and demanding a significant increase in military spending, and furtherRead more
Golding called his "attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature." 14 References edit " lord OF THE flies (15. Alleva also criticized what he saw as misrepresentations ofRead more
Points of Machiavelli in The Prince
not important and can be immoral. He was a good ruler, but it was this appearance of weakness that led his troops to kill victims Of Different Wars him. Granted, there are some aspects of Machiavelli's teachings that are surely controversial and should be viewed in light of their historical context. He feels that Italian princes have lost their states because they have not had armed people.
Therefore, a number of highly visible executions can be a very effective means of controlling the people and in preventing a major outbreak of violence and murder. Machiavelli often gets credit for saying this classic" about consequentialism which says that a morally right act is one that causes a positive outcome. Cruelty was also some times necessary. Overall, Machiavellis work has lasted through the years, and it has proven to be a classic piece of literature by standing the test of time. Otherwise, if the servants are failing, its the princes error for choosing such help. The case of the tone-deaf United Airlines CEO's initial response to the outrage over a passenger dragged out of their plane comes to mind. And I know that every one will confess that it would be most praiseworthy in a prince to exhibit all the above qualities that are considered good. What does he in general have to say about them? When his power is devolved through magistrates, they may disobey him or refuse to carry out his orders. He believes that when given the opportunity one must destroy completely, because if one does not he will certainly be destroyed. Machiavelli tells us that the sovereign must take whatever action is necessary to maintain order in society. The prince must take advantage of situations based solely on if it is best for the state.